On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Ceri Davies wrote:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 06:10:06PM +0800, Xin LI wrote:On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:21:10AM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote:I don't really think that this benchmark is bad news for either OS. My only real concern are the process creation/termination results on FreeBSD.
I guess that this might worth investigating:
http://people.freebsd.org/~das/pbench/pbench.html
(Unfortuantelly, neither tjr@ nor I have touched our patchsets recently. A most recent snapshot of the two patchsets are here:
http://research.delphij.net/freebsd/pid.diff http://research.delphij.net/freebsd/pid-tjr.diff)
Most of the work was to catch up with Aug 2004's -CURRENT, but it might be easier to bring them up-to-date instead of working from the very original patches =-)
Looks great. Any reason why neither has been committed?
Any idea what type of impact this patch would have on say, a large qmail server that's drowning in context-switches?
Charles
Ceri -- Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Einstein (attrib.)
_______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
