On Sat, Jan 08, 2005, Ceri Davies wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 06:10:06PM +0800, Xin LI wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:21:10AM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > > > I don't really think that this benchmark is bad news for either OS. My > > > only real concern are the process creation/termination results on FreeBSD. > > > > I guess that this might worth investigating: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~das/pbench/pbench.html > > > > (Unfortuantelly, neither tjr@ nor I have touched our patchsets recently. > > A most recent snapshot of the two patchsets are here: > > > > http://research.delphij.net/freebsd/pid.diff > > http://research.delphij.net/freebsd/pid-tjr.diff) > > > > Most of the work was to catch up with Aug 2004's -CURRENT, but it might > > be easier to bring them up-to-date instead of working from the very original > > patches =-) > > Looks great. Any reason why neither has been committed?
I've pinged Tim several times, but I think he's busy with his job in the real world to worry about "jobs" in FreeBSD right now. However, there's no rush. There's a lot of lower-hanging fruit in the fork/exec/exit path, including a gratuitous number of acquisitions and releases of Giant. _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
