On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 09:55:21PM +1000, Q wrote: > I beg to differ. It might show linear growth, but the OpenBSD graph is > definitely not O(n).
Hmm, it looks like that when it hits the next threshold, it's O(n), but O(1) otherwise. But contrary to the blurry Linux 2.4 fork() graph, the thresholds seem set at fixed numbers of pages. Zlo _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
