On 14-Nov-2002 Kenneth Culver wrote: >> several functions that call vm_object functions in FreeBSD's kernel that >> eventually call atomic_clear_short(). For some reason those functions in >> between aren't in the backtrace though, and without that I can (and >> have) look through the code in the kernel to see how nv_alloc_pages can >> get to atomic_clear_short through vm calls, but I'm not sure that's too >> awefully helpful. > > Actually, after tracing through again, it appears to be following this > codepath: (in reverse order from a backtrace) > > nv_alloc_pages() > nv_free_vm_object() > vm_object_deallocate() > vm_object_clear_flag() > atomic_clear_short() > > so I think it's possible that something may be getting screwed up between > nv_free_vm_object and atomic_clear_short(). I'm not really sure how to > tell though.
Are you sure that nv_free_vm_object() is free'ing a valid object? -- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message