Thus spake Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The entire idea of "bit rot" is really "the code did not keep > ``up to date'' with my changes, which broke the code", which > is really a ridiculous position. > > It really pissed me off when the AHA-1742 support dropped out > when CAM came in, but that, at least, was understandable, since > it was a trade: something deisrable for something less desirable > to the majority of users. > > You really *can not* blame breaking "something that used to work > but which no longer works" on "evolution".
Aah...we'd better put uucp back in the base system, then. Never mind that it might have security problems that we don't know about. :P To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
