If you didn't say it, then you weren't the one I was talking about, was I?
:-) I got several other private mails saying that BSD licensed code was the one and only way, and 2 or 3 mails (from Ben, among others) saying that BSD-licensed was preferred. Either approach is as flawed as someone who claims GPL only or GPL preferred. The license terms of add-on drivers and products should be set according to the needs of the authoring person or company, in my opinion. Doug On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, void wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 12:19:34PM -0500, Doug Hass wrote: > > > > I'm glad someone else is speaking up--all I've heard is Ted's point of > > view (from him, and from others who have said the same thing: FreeBSD only > > accepts BSD licensed code, period.) > > I said to you in private mail that where there's a BSD-licensed solution > and a non-BSD-licensed solution, all else being roughly equal, FreeBSD > tends towards the BSD-licensed solution. Not the same thing at all. > > -- > Ben > > "An art scene of delight > I created this to be ..." -- Sun Ra > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
