On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Mike Smith wrote:

> > Well, honestly, FreeBSD makes the life of the developers of third-party
> > binary-only drivers fairly difficult.
> 
> It does?  On the whole, actually, I'd say we do a pretty good job of
> making it easy.
> 
> > The reason is that there
> > are a lot of API changes happening between the releases (take
> > Julian Elisher's recent problem for example).
> 
> It's a poor example.  Drivers don't involve themselves in the sysinit
> chain.

welllllll it gets involved.. if you redefine the SYSINIT values,
old drivers's aren't 'notified'

(should be a module but the supplier didn't make one..)

> 
> > So the driver writers
> > are forced to at least recompile their drivers for each release.
> 
> This isn't typically the case, actually.  4.x has in fact been very 
> good in this regard.

with the above exception, I agree.

though in userland, the library changes have caused us some grief.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to