On 14-Sep-2001 Peter Pentchev wrote: > So.. if I read you right, booting correctly for > 1024 cylinders works > if boot0 knows about it. Isn't boot0 the one in the MBR, not in the fbsd > slice? Does this mean that boot1 and boot2 should work just fine if they > are loaded by another kind of MBR loader (say, Grub), and they find out > that they are placed beyond the 1023th cylinder? FYI the way you actually DO this is run boot0cfg :) eg.. boot0cfg -v -o packet /dev/mydiskdevice --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? rnordier
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? Kent Stewart
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? Doug Ambrisko
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? John Baldwin
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? John Baldwin
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? Doug Ambrisko
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? Kent Stewart
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? John Baldwin
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? Kent Stewart
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? John Baldwin
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? David O'Brien
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? John Baldwin
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? Kent Stewart
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? Kent Stewart