John Baldwin writes: | This is for boot0. Nothing should be touching boot1 flags. | My guess is that someone has somehow mixed an old boot2 with the new boot1 | which is jumping to the wrong place to call xread. The "code" at cs:eip looks | a lot like the BPB in boot1 now. Okay that basically how I read the code. Just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something. Your theory sounds quite possible. Thanks, Doug A. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? Mike Smith
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? John Baldwin
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? Peter Pentchev
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? Mike Smith
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? Kent Stewart
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? rnordier
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? Kent Stewart
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? Doug Ambrisko
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? John Baldwin
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? John Baldwin
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? Doug Ambrisko
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? Kent Stewart
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? John Baldwin
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? Kent Stewart
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? John Baldwin
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? David O'Brien
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? John Baldwin
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? Kent Stewart
- Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? Kent Stewart