On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 09:28:22AM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote: > > In any case if all the info needed wasn't there, the command would fail, > a-la mutt http://www.ufp.org (no user portion). I believe that <http://www.ufp.org> is a valid local email address. -- Ben "An art scene of delight I created this to be ..." -- Sun Ra To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. .
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Spike Gronim
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Steve Roome
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Greg Black
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Leo Bicknell
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Raymond Wiker
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Greg Black
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Mike Meyer
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Paul Richards
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Leo Bicknell
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Richard Hodges
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Paul Richards
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Michael Sinz
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Paul Chvostek
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Joseph Mallett
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Chris Costello
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Chris Costello
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Leo Bicknell
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Chris Costello
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Leo Bicknell