On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:52:50AM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> If memory serves me right, Wilko Bulte wrote:
>
> > This probably also explains why make release succeeded yesterday on another
> > alpha, it seems to be fixed now:
>
> OK. I think I may have been slightly wrong on what ailed the graphics/
> gd port (apologies to mi), but if it's fixed, this is a moot point.
>
> On the successful make release mentioned above, you *did* build docs
> right? Only reason I'm asking is that I've never personally seen an
Eh, that was the other machine, yes, the build went OK and the
ports necessary ports for doc building were also correctly built.
> alpha release with RELNOTESng, so I'm just guessing that all of the
> alpha-dependent content built correctly for the release (as opposed to
> when I do RELNOTESng snapshots).
I have not checked the generated docs, but I assume things went OK.
The DS10 is now rolling tarballs (with NODOC=YES) so that make release
appears to have run OK. I can try (overnight) a new make release without
the NODOC and see what tomorrow morning gives me.
If that proves OK I think I put the resulting .iso up for download.
Wilko
--
| / o / / _ Arnhem, The Netherlands email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
