If memory serves me right, Wilko Bulte wrote: > This probably also explains why make release succeeded yesterday on another > alpha, it seems to be fixed now: OK. I think I may have been slightly wrong on what ailed the graphics/ gd port (apologies to mi), but if it's fixed, this is a moot point. On the successful make release mentioned above, you *did* build docs right? Only reason I'm asking is that I've never personally seen an alpha release with RELNOTESng, so I'm just guessing that all of the alpha-dependent content built correctly for the release (as opposed to when I do RELNOTESng snapshots). Bruce.
- building 'release' and compiling doc ports Wilko Bulte
- Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports Bruce A. Mah
- Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports Wilko Bulte
- Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports Bruce A. Mah
- Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports Wilko Bulte
- Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports David O'Brien
- Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports Wilko Bulte
- Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports Wilko Bulte
- Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports Wilko Bulte
- Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports Bruce A. Mah
- Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports Wilko Bulte
- Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports Bruce A. Mah
- Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports Wilko Bulte
- Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports Bruce A. Mah
- Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports Wilko Bulte
- Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports Wilko Bulte
- Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports Wilko Bulte
- Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports Bruce A. Mah
- Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports David O'Brien
- Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports Wilko Bulte