Matt Dillon([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.07.13 15:27:08 +0000:
> Also, do performance testing with dynamic-linked verses static-linked
> binaries. Static-linked binaries may look larger, but they have a
> much lower dirty-page overhead then the dynamically linked equivalent.
> It depends on the situation but it is definitely worth testing.
yup, and for highvolume dumbfire boxes (static web content, ftp server)
i also have one box running with options NO_SWAPPING and carefully
calculated limits in the userland. runs like a charm. i use the swap
partition mostly to hold a crashdump if i'm trying something weird ;-)
/k
--
> question = ( to ) ? be : ! be; // Wm. Shakespeare
KR433/KR11-RIPE -- WebMonster Community Founder -- nGENn GmbH Senior Techie
http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.net/
karsten&rohrbach.de -- alpha&ngenn.net -- alpha&scene.org -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG 0x2964BF46 2001-03-15 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46
Please do not remove my address from To: and Cc: fields in mailing lists. 10x
PGP signature
