On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Dima Dorfman wrote: > I don't think anybody is even remotely suggesting that MFS be removed, > but someone (other than you) might get bitten by a change of this > sort. I guess it's just a matter of whether the new functionality > (and giving people a head start integrating the new behavior into > their systems) is worth burning however many people depend on the old > behavior. > > Dima Dorfman > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ok, silly question from the peanut gallery time. If md is different than md used to be, could the name be changed to something other than md which wouldn't conflict with the old md? Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? Dima Dorfman
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? David O'Brien
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? David O'Brien
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionali... Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functio... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? Warner Losh
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? Dima Dorfman
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionali... Mike Silbersack
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? Dima Dorfman
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionali... Mike Smith
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functio... Warner Losh
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functio... Dima Dorfman
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? Jacques A. Vidrine
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? David O'Brien
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? John Polstra