In message <70325.991758797@critter> Poul-Henning Kamp writes: : In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "David O'Brien" writes: : >On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 07:46:18PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote: : >> Is there any reason not to MFC the new md(4) functionality : > : >Zero reason not to. : : Others see it differently, it would seriously break a lot of : people who are using -stable in embedded applications. : : If we have abandoned the "no changes to API or ABI in -stable" : paradigm, it would be a good idea, but it serious rains on that : rule... I've stated in the past that removing mfs from stable is going to cause me some grief. However, the addition of md won't so long as mfs remains intact. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? Dima Dorfman
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? David O'Brien
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? David O'Brien
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionali... Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functio... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? Warner Losh
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? Dima Dorfman
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionali... Mike Silbersack
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? Dima Dorfman
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionali... Mike Smith
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functio... Warner Losh
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functio... Dima Dorfman
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? Jacques A. Vidrine
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? David O'Brien
- Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? John Polstra