On Wed, 23 May 2001, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > You are not the only one. I can appreciate the `neat' factor, but I > cringed at the commit. It seems like functionality that would be > better put in a separate utility (or port even). It's not like you'd > ever want to run the NVT protocol over an AF_UNIX socket. It depends on how you look at it. If you see telnet as a network client, then you cringe at this (I did initially). But when you think about it, all telnet really does is connect to sockets, so why not extend its functionality to local sockets? -gordon To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PATCH] Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PATCH] Alfred Perlstein
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PATCH] Matt Dillon
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PATCH] Matt Dillon
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PATCH] James Howard
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PA... Matt Dillon
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets... Brian Somers
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PA... Jacques A. Vidrine
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets... Gordon Tetlow
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX soc... Jacques A. Vidrine
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX soc... Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX soc... Jacques A. Vidrine
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX soc... Matt Dillon
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX soc... Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX soc... Matt Dillon
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX soc... Peter Wemm
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX soc... Jacques A. Vidrine
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX soc... Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets... Neil Blakey-Milner