On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:10:20PM -0400, James Howard wrote: > I am missing something here. Is there a practical use for this? :) You are not the only one. I can appreciate the `neat' factor, but I cringed at the commit. It seems like functionality that would be better put in a separate utility (or port even). It's not like you'd ever want to run the NVT protocol over an AF_UNIX socket. -- Jacques Vidrine / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PATCH] Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PATCH] Alfred Perlstein
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PATCH] Matt Dillon
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PATCH] Matt Dillon
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PATCH] James Howard
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PA... Matt Dillon
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets... Brian Somers
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PA... Jacques A. Vidrine
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets... Gordon Tetlow
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX soc... Jacques A. Vidrine
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX soc... Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX soc... Jacques A. Vidrine
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX soc... Matt Dillon
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX soc... Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX soc... Matt Dillon
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX soc... Peter Wemm
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX soc... Jacques A. Vidrine
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX soc... Lyndon Nerenberg