In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein writes: >* Peter Seebach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010329 23:49] wrote: >> The only portable solution is the new feature in C99. >Which new feature? C99 allows the last member of a struct to be declared as an array with no size; this implies an object which will act like an array, but which isn't directly bounds-checked. -s To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Question regarding the ar... Lord Isildur
- Re: Question regarding the ar... John Franklin
- Re: Question regarding the ar... Lord Isildur
- Re: Question regarding the ar... John Franklin
- Re: Question regarding the ar... Benny Prijono
- Re: Question regarding the ar... John Gregor
- Re: Question regarding the ar... Greg A. Woods
- Re: Question regarding the ar... Drew Eckhardt
- Re: Question regarding the ar... Frederick Bruckman
- Re: Question regarding the ar... Peter Seebach
- Re: Question regarding the array ... Peter Seebach
- Re: Question regarding the array of size 0. Johan Danielsson
- Question regarding ifconfig. Shankar Agarwal
- Re: Question regarding ifconfig. Bill Studenmund
- Re: Question regarding the array of size 0. Greywolf
- Re: Question regarding the array of size 0. Farooq Mela
- Re: Question regarding the array of size 0. Andrew Brown
- Re: Question regarding the array of size 0. der Mouse
- Re: Question regarding the array of size 0. Richard Earnshaw
- Re: Question regarding the array of size 0. Peter Seebach
- Re: Question regarding the array of size 0... Richard Earnshaw