On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Harti Brandt wrote: > AP>> The only portable solution is the new feature in C99. A contradiction in terms, since there are no C99 compilers yet. (Are there?) > Well, that's even lesser portability. > > struct foo { > double bar; > int baz[0]; > }; > > works for both compilers. Frederick To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Question regarding the array of si... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Question regarding the array ... Harti Brandt
- Re: Question regarding the ar... Lord Isildur
- Re: Question regarding the ar... John Franklin
- Re: Question regarding the ar... Lord Isildur
- Re: Question regarding the ar... John Franklin
- Re: Question regarding the ar... Benny Prijono
- Re: Question regarding the ar... John Gregor
- Re: Question regarding the ar... Greg A. Woods
- Re: Question regarding the ar... Drew Eckhardt
- Re: Question regarding the ar... Frederick Bruckman
- Re: Question regarding the ar... Peter Seebach
- Re: Question regarding the array ... Peter Seebach
- Re: Question regarding the array of size 0. Johan Danielsson
- Question regarding ifconfig. Shankar Agarwal
- Re: Question regarding ifconfig. Bill Studenmund
- Re: Question regarding the array of size 0. Greywolf
- Re: Question regarding the array of size 0. Farooq Mela
- Re: Question regarding the array of size 0. Andrew Brown
- Re: Question regarding the array of size 0. der Mouse
- Re: Question regarding the array of size 0. Richard Earnshaw