* Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010321 09:51] wrote: > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Peter Wemm wrote: > > > Also, 4MB = 1024 pages, at 28 bytes per mapping == 28k per process. > > 28 bytes/mapping is a LOT. I've implemented an (admittedly > not completely architecture-independent) reverse mapping > patch for Linux with an overhead of 8 bytes/pte... > > I wonder how hard/easy would it be to reduce the memory > overhead of some of these old Mach data structures in FreeBSD... "Our" Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Tor Egge have been trimming these structs down for quite some time. Perhaps they should look at Linux's system, however last I checked Linux's was an order of magnitude less complex which might prohibit that simplification in FreeBSD. If you have suggestions, let's hear them. :) -- -Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded scerver Alfred Perlstein
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded scerver Matt Dillon
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded scerver Alfred Perlstein
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded scerver Michael C . Wu
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded scerver Matt Dillon
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded scerver Michael C . Wu
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded scerver Alfred Perlstein
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded sce... Matt Dillon
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded s ce... Peter Wemm
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded s ce... Rik van Riel
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded s ce... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded s ce... Matt Dillon
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded s ce... Rik van Riel
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded s ce... thinker
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded s ce... Rik van Riel
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded s ce... Michael C . Wu
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded s ce... Matt Dillon
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded s ce... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded s ce... Matt Dillon
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded s ce... Michael C . Wu
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded s ce... Alfred Perlstein