On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Also, 4MB = 1024 pages, at 28 bytes per mapping == 28k per process.
28 bytes/mapping is a LOT. I've implemented an (admittedly
not completely architecture-independent) reverse mapping
patch for Linux with an overhead of 8 bytes/pte...
I wonder how hard/easy would it be to reduce the memory
overhead of some of these old Mach data structures in FreeBSD...
regards,
Rik
--
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded scerver Michael C . Wu
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded scerver Alfred Perlstein
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded scerver Matt Dillon
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded sce... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded scerver Michael C . Wu
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded scerver Matt Dillon
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded scerver Michael C . Wu
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded sce... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded ... Matt Dillon
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded ... Peter Wemm
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded ... Rik van Riel
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded ... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded ... Matt Dillon
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded ... Rik van Riel
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded ... thinker
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded ... Rik van Riel
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded ... Michael C . Wu
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded ... Matt Dillon
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded ... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded ... Matt Dillon
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded ... Michael C . Wu

