At 03:42 PM 03/10/2001, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > >Each link is checked once every second to see if the link is still up. > >An attempt to send a packet over a dead link will cause the packet to > >be shifted over to the next link in the bundle. > >Any chance this can be done through an async event rather >than by polling? I've been meaning to ask about this...is there a reason that ethernet drivers dont call if_up and if_down like serial drivers on cable events? This is needed for load balancing so that the UP flag can be used instead of polling or an event. Of course a polling protocol is needed also. Dennis To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: call for testers: port aggregation netgraph ... Chris Dillon
- Re: call for testers: port aggregation netgr... Alex Pilosov
- Re: call for testers: port aggregation n... Louis A. Mamakos
- Re: call for testers: port aggregation n... Chris Dillon
- Re: call for testers: port aggregat... Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: call for testers: port aggr... Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: call for testers: port aggregation n... Bill Paul
- Re: call for testers: port aggregation netgraph module Julian Elischer
- Re: call for testers: port aggregation netgraph module Archie Cobbs
- Re: call for testers: port aggregation netgraph module Justin T. Gibbs
- Re: call for testers: port aggregation netgraph module Julian Elischer
- Re: call for testers: port aggregation netgraph module Julian Elischer
- Re: call for testers: port aggregation netgraph module Archie Cobbs
- RE: call for testers: port aggregation netgraph module Peter Blok