On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Chris Dillon wrote: > On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Dan Nelson wrote: > Cool, if thats all it will take, I'll give it a try. But, whatever > method Compaq/Intel is using doesn't require me to set up the ports on > the switch as being part of a trunk. It "just works". And IIRC, when Its not real trunking. Your incoming traffic will still come on a single link, only outbound traffic will be shared. (Or at least that's how I think compaq stuff will work). > I actually tried to set the ports on the 3COM switch up as trunk > ports, it didn't work right. Maybe 3COM is doing something entirely > different. Prolly. FEC is cisco-specific thingy, like ISL... -alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- call for testers: port aggregation netgraph module Bill Paul
- Re: call for testers: port aggregation netgraph modu... Chris Dillon
- Re: call for testers: port aggregation netgraph ... Dan Nelson
- Re: call for testers: port aggregation netgr... Mike Smith
- Re: call for testers: port aggregation netgr... Chris Dillon
- Re: call for testers: port aggregation n... Alex Pilosov
- Re: call for testers: port aggregat... Louis A. Mamakos
- Re: call for testers: port aggregat... Chris Dillon
- Re: call for testers: port aggr... Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: call for testers: port ... Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: call for testers: port aggregat... Bill Paul
- Re: call for testers: port aggregation netgraph modu... Julian Elischer
- Re: call for testers: port aggregation netgraph modu... Archie Cobbs
- Re: call for testers: port aggregation netgraph modu... Justin T. Gibbs