Rik van Riel wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Andre Oppermann wrote: > > > But please answer me one question: Is the link() call atomically > > in FFS/UFS w or w/o softupdates? Meaning when the call returns > > the meta- data is written to stable storage like with fsync()? > > Since when does `atomic' equal `synchronous' ? Because otherwise it would not be atomically, would it? -- Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail I... Andre Oppermann
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Rik van Riel
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Mike Silbersack
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO proble... Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO pr... Andre Oppermann
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail I... Rik van Riel
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail I... Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qm... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qm... Andre Oppermann
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qm... Rik van Riel
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qm... Andre Oppermann
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qm... Rik van Riel
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qm... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qm... Andre Oppermann
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qm... Jack Rusher
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO pr... Greg Black
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail I... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qm... Maxime Henrion
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qm... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qm... Peter Wemm
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qm... Poul-Henning Kamp