Rik van Riel wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> 
> > But please answer me one question: Is the link() call atomically
> > in FFS/UFS w or w/o softupdates? Meaning when the call returns
> > the meta- data is written to stable storage like with fsync()?
> 
> Since when does `atomic' equal `synchronous' ?

Because otherwise it would not be atomically, would it?

-- 
Andre


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to