On 24 Dec, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 23 Dec 2000, at 2:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> On 23 Dec, Dan Langille wrote:
>> > On 23 Dec 2000, at 13:25, David Preece wrote:
>> >
>> >> At 15:37 22/12/00 -0800, you wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >The question asked is: why you believe ssh is beter
>> >> >than say telnet. Or what advantages SSH has in general.
>> >>
>> >> Sorry, don't have time to reply to this properly.
>> >>
>> >> The main evil of ssh is that server authentication is not enforced, making
>> >> mounting a man-in-the-middle attack basically trivial.
>> >
>> > It is possible. It is not trivial.
>> >
>> What leads you to believe that it's not trival?
>
> You are the one claiming it is trivial. The onus is on you to prove your
> own claim. Or conversely, prove me wrong. I'm not feeding you.
>
I'm sorry, even after reading the attributes at the
top of the messages. It says:
> At 15:37 22/12/00 -0800, you wrote:
That does not mean the portion written is
attibutable(sp?) to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
I can see how there might be a confusion on this
since someone failed to put in attributes
for my original messages. Sorry I cannot help you answer
what is "not trivial".
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
