On 23 Dec, Dan Langille wrote: > On 23 Dec 2000, at 13:25, David Preece wrote: > >> At 15:37 22/12/00 -0800, you wrote: >> >> >The question asked is: why you believe ssh is beter >> >than say telnet. Or what advantages SSH has in general. >> >> Sorry, don't have time to reply to this properly. >> >> The main evil of ssh is that server authentication is not enforced, making >> mounting a man-in-the-middle attack basically trivial. > > It is possible. It is not trivial. > What leads you to believe that it's not trival? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- ssh - are you nuts?!? opentrax
- Re: ssh - are you nuts?!? Chris Costello
- Re: ssh - are you nuts?!? Peter Seebach
- Re: ssh - are you nuts?!? Luigi Rizzo
- Re: ssh - are you nuts?!? opentrax
- Re: ssh - are you nuts?!? David Preece
- Re: ssh - are you nuts?!? Dan Langille
- Re: ssh - are you nuts?!? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: ssh - are you nuts?!? opentrax
- Re: ssh - are you nuts?!? Dan Langille
- Re: ssh - are you nuts?!? opentrax
- Re: ssh - are you nuts?!? Bill Fumerola
- Re: ssh - are you nuts?!? opentrax
- Re: ssh - are you nuts?!? void
- Re: ssh - are you nuts?!? Donald J . Maddox
- Re: ssh - are you nuts?!? Julian Elischer
- Re: ssh - are you nuts?!? Chris BeHanna
- Re: ssh - are you nuts?!? opentrax
- Re: ssh - are you nuts?!? Giorgos Keramidas