Rik van Riel wrote: > > It's quite common for a manufacturer to completely stop > driver development once a particular model of hardware > (say a certain video card) is no longer sold. > > This, in turn, leads to the situation where the user has > to chose between the following options: > > 1. don't upgrade the software, because a driver is not > available for the new system > 2. upgrade the hardware to a version which has a > driver available for the new software The answer is: make the new systems binary compatible with old drivers. What all the commercial Unix systems try to do to some degree. And of course the ultimate technology today for this purpose is UDI. -SB To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- RE: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Steve Shoecraft
- Re: RE: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Matt Dillon
- Open Hardware Initiative (was Re: FreeBSD vs L... Nick Sayer
- Re: Open Hardware Initiative (was Re: FreeBSD ... Mike Smith
- RE: RE: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Steve Shoecraft
- Re: RE: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Rik van Riel
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Peter Seebach
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT David O'Brien
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Peter Seebach
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Gérard Roudier
- Re: RE: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Sergey Babkin
- Re: RE: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Chris BeHanna
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Dennis
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Marco van de Voort
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Dennis
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Peter Seebach
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Marco van de Voort
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Mike Nowlin
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Bill Fumerola
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Sergey Babkin
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Peter Seebach