On 26 Oct 2012 20:15, "Chris Rees" <utis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 26 Oct 2012 19:12, "David O'Brien" <obr...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:12:44AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > Do be able to get the ports tree working with bmake asap, I also asked
> > > him to MFC it to 9.1, from latest reply he got positive answer from
re@
> > > about this, but was waiting for something I don't remember.
> >
> > :tu/:tl is in releng/9.1, so it will also be in 9.1-RELEASE.
>
> Then we only have two supported stable branches you propose to break...
>
OK, how about this:
:L -- seems that bmake's use for this is kinda pointless; returning the
name of the variable; we could swap that usage over directly.
:U -- with bmake has non-optional arguments, so for example:
${VAR:U} - pmake behaviour
${VAR:Uval} - make behaviour.
Would that be acceptable? I can get a patch in if that's popular.
Chris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
