In message <199908181716.kaa12...@usr02.primenet.com>, Terry Lambert writes: >> > > I'm not familiar with the VFS_default stuff. All the vop_default_desc >> > > routines in NetBSD point to error routines. >> > >> > In FreeBSD, they now point to default routines that are *not* error >> > routines. This is the problem. I admit the change was very well >> > intentioned, since it made the code a hell of a lot more readable, >> > but choosing between readable and additional function, I take function >> > over form (I think the way I would have "fixed" the readability is by >> > making the operations that result in the descriptor set for a mounted >> > FS instance be both discrete, and named for their specific function). >> >> As I recall most of FBSD's default routines are also error routines, if >> the exceptions were a problem it would would be trivial to fix. > >You would have to de-collapse several VOP lists that have been >pre-collapsed.
You are talking gibberish here. Please show code where this is a problem. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member p...@freebsd.org "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
