On Mon, 2 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > I don't think we should change getportbyname. If the getportbyname > fails, see if a strtol returns a number, and if so use that. I don't > see what is so hard about doing that.
I agree. The change should be made in inetd, not in getportbyname() > If someone wants to run a service on a port that it wasn't desinged > for, they can still do it today. I don't see what the argument > against this change could possibly be. There is no evil here. Changing getportbyname() would be, which is what was discussed before. -- - bill fumerola - bi...@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfume...@computerhorizons.com - bi...@freebsd.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
