Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > John-Mark Gurney <gurne...@efn.org> writes: > > Sheldon Hearn scribbled this message on Aug 1: > > > Would you need these entries if inetd let you specify port numbers > > > instead of service names? > > I vote for allowing inetd.conf to specify a port number instead of a > > service name... it should be very easy to make the modification, and > > I'm willing to do all the work, assuming no one on -committers objects.. > > The correct way to do this is to fix getservbyname() so it accepts > port numbers.
Are you sure this is what you want? It may allow an application to use a port number that would otherwise be invalid. Dan Eischen eisc...@vigrid.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
