Here is a pro vote for enabling BPF in GENERIC:

It will let us use a dhcp client in the install programs, this is of tremendous
use to many people as DHCP starts to become much more popular.  I cannot
net install a machine at home since that is on a DHCP cable modem service.

Also, if root is compromised on a system, even if you don't have bpf installed
you would be a fool to believe that they are not sniffing packets/passwords.
At the very least Mr. Pragmatic(sp?) has shown the world the power and 
flexability of KLDs... I am sure someone could write a KLD to impliment the
functionality of a packet sniffer.  Also  an attacker, once obtaining root,
could certainly trojan ftpd/sshd/telnetd/login/whatever.  I think disabling
bpf for "security reasons" is a false sense of security.

--
David Cross                               | email: cro...@cs.rpi.edu 
Systems Administrator/Research Programmer | Web: http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~crossd 
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute,         | Ph: 518.276.2860            
Department of Computer Science            | Fax: 518.276.4033
I speak only for myself.                  | WinNT:Linux::Linux:FreeBSD


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to