> on another note, LIBWRAP_INTERNAL looks like it must be defined for > internal services to be wrapped, yet it is not defined during freebsd's > compile -- only LIBWRAP is. yet freebsd's inetd man page says that internal > services may be wrapped. since it is not currently so by default, perhaps
There was a bug in LIBWRAP_INTERNAL, that has now been fixed in -CURRENT. If you are using 3.2-STABLE, ask Sheldon Hearn <[email protected]> when it will be merged from -CURRENT. -- -- David ([email protected] -or- [email protected]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
