Mike Smith wrote: > > > > The issue is with really small ram embedded systems. > > Making things CAPABLE of being small is different from making > > them dynamicly loadable. > > Nobody in their right mind is going to produce a "really small ram" > embedded system that features the sort of nondeterminism that > "automatically" (read 'randomly') unloading modules would involve. Actually, embedded programmers are more likely to link everything in the kernel so they don't have to worry about calling drivers that aren't loaded. A pretty conservative lot, in general. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://softweyr.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Robert Watson
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Warner Losh
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Peter Wemm
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Warner Losh
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Nate Williams
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Mike Nowlin
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Julian Elischer
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Mike Smith
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Wes Peters
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Nate Williams
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Mike Smith
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Boris Popov
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Kris Kennaway
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD void
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Bosko Milekic