On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 04:08:42PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > You weren't listening..no-one debates the utility of auto-loading modules, > and that is the direction FreeBSD is already heading. The debate is over > the utility of automatically UNLOADING modules when they're "no longer in > use". Doesn't Solaris auto-unload unused drivers when memory gets tight? -- Ben 220 go.ahead.make.my.day ESMTP Postfix To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Wes Peters
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Nate Williams
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Mike Smith
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Boris Popov
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Kris Kennaway
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD void
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Bosko Milekic
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Andrew Kenneth Milton
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Neil Blakey-Milner
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Neil Blakey-Milner
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Jack Rusher
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD void
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Mike Smith