:>
:> I'll look at that tonight. But before I do -- why is it broken?
:> (the name sorta implies that it us ;)
:
:I'm not sure, i did it a while back and ran out of time to get it
:working, it functions in the strategy layer and tries to grab adjacent
:commit blocks to the already clustered IO.
:
:I think I may have some math errors or something, I haven't had time
:to give it a retry in a while.
:
:--
:-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
:"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
If I remember the right patch, I think my comment on it was
that the buffers should use non-blocking locks rather then
blocking locks in order to avoid deadlocks, which it looks like
you did.
This may still patch into -stable but it probably isn't safe
to patch into -current. It still looks a little rough but
the general concept is sound.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
