* Andrew Gallatin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000404 14:25] wrote:
>
> Alfred Perlstein writes:
> > >
> > > Can anybody tell me if doing something like this is fundamentally
> > > broken? Is it worth pursuing?
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/~alfred/nfs_supercommit_broken.diff
> >
> > only grab as many adjacent blocks as possible, you don't want to
> > scan the entire file's buffer list for each commit, you also don't
> > want to interfere with other client's caching forcing sever commits
> > on thier behalf.
> >
>
> I'll look at that tonight. But before I do -- why is it broken?
> (the name sorta implies that it us ;)
I'm not sure, i did it a while back and ran out of time to get it
working, it functions in the strategy layer and tries to grab adjacent
commit blocks to the already clustered IO.
I think I may have some math errors or something, I haven't had time
to give it a retry in a while.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
