On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > No, you're not reading the thread properly. Someone else (who doesn't > have the same bandwidth limitations that you and I do) said it doesn't > compress well. Ok, fair enough. My stance was that some compression was better than no compression, but I'll bow out now... :) > If you're just replying to be involved in an argument, I have a few > newsgroups for you to try. :-) I know, I've seen you on them. :) > Otherwise, this is pretty much asked and answered. Fair enough, like I said, I'll bow out. Cheers, -- Paul Robinson - Developer/Systems Administrator @ Akitanet Internet To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Why not gzip iso images? Arnout Boer
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Sheldon Hearn
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Luigi Rizzo
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Why not gzip iso images... Paul Robinson
- Re: Why not gzip iso i... Sheldon Hearn
- Re: Why not gzip i... Paul Robinson
- Re: Why not gz... Sheldon Hearn
- Re: Why not gz... Paul Robinson
- Re: Why not gz... Patryk Zadarnowski
- Re: Why not gzip i... Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: Why not gzip i... Victor Ivanov
- Re: Why not gzip iso i... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Why not gzip i... andrew
- Re: Why not gz... Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
- Re: Why not gz... Jordan K. Hubbard
- That's why [Re: Wh... Victor Ivanov
- Re: Why not gzip iso i... Peter Edwards
- Re: Why not gzip iso i... Daniel C. Sobral