On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Seriously though, there's no reason not to have the ISOs up in > compressed format though. I guess given a choice between _only_ > compressed or _only_ uncompressed I think uncompressed is better, > but if the space is available it would be nice to see compressed > images available. How many FTP servers support on the fly gzipping and ungzipping? mirror.aarnet.edu.au does...perhaps a little note could be placed in .message to remind people to try it... Andrew (who is on 33.6 and dosnt even contemplate downloading ISO images) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Paul Robinson
- Re: Why not gzip iso images... Sheldon Hearn
- Re: Why not gzip iso i... Paul Robinson
- Re: Why not gzip i... Sheldon Hearn
- Re: Why not gzip i... Paul Robinson
- Re: Why not gzip i... Patryk Zadarnowski
- Re: Why not gzip iso i... Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: Why not gzip iso i... Victor Ivanov
- Re: Why not gzip iso images... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Why not gzip iso i... andrew
- Re: Why not gzip i... Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
- Re: Why not gzip i... Jordan K. Hubbard
- That's why [Re: Why no... Victor Ivanov
- Re: Why not gzip iso images... Peter Edwards
- Re: Why not gzip iso images... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Donn Miller
- RE: Why not gzip iso images? Wood, Richard
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Eric D. Futch
- Re: Why not gzip iso images? Leif Neland