hi, there! On Sun, 5 Mar 2000, Chris Costello wrote: > ksh doesn't claim to be POSIX compliant? > > "ksh is intended to conform to the Shell Language Standard > developed by the IEEE POSIX 1003.2 Shell and Utilities Language > Committee." > -- http://www.kornshell.com/info/ > > And on a FreeBSD-compiled binary of the real AT&T ksh code: > > $ echo ${.sh.version} > Version M 1993-12-28 i > $ for i in ; do echo $i; done > $ However, under Solaris 2.6: clone$uname -a SunOS clone 5.6 Generic_105181-13 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-1-Engine clone$/bin/ksh clone$for i in ; do echo $i; done /bin/ksh: syntax error: `;' unexpected clone$ /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: empty lists in for (/bin/sh) Max Khon
- Re: empty lists in for (/bin/sh... Martin Cracauer
- Re: empty lists in for W Gerald Hicks
- Re: empty lists in for W Gerald Hicks
- Re: empty lists in for Doug Barton
- Re: empty lists in for W Gerald Hicks
- Re: empty lists in for Doug Barton
- Re: empty lists in for John Polstra
- Re: empty lists in for W Gerald Hicks
- Re: empty lists in for Chris Costello
- Re: empty lists in for Max Khon
- Re: empty lists in for Chris Costello
- Re: empty lists in for David Scheidt
- Re: empty lists in for Arindum Mukerji
- Re: empty lists in for Christian Weisgerber
- Re: empty lists in for Sheldon Hearn
- Re: empty lists in for Doug Barton
- Re: empty lists in for Sheldon Hearn
- Re: empty lists in for Warner Losh
- Re: empty lists in for Doug Barton
- Re: empty lists in for Sheldon Hearn