On Saturday, March 04, 2000, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > Neither bash nor ksh claim to be particularly POSIX compliant. our > /bin/sh does. ksh doesn't claim to be POSIX compliant? "ksh is intended to conform to the Shell Language Standard developed by the IEEE POSIX 1003.2 Shell and Utilities Language Committee." -- http://www.kornshell.com/info/ And on a FreeBSD-compiled binary of the real AT&T ksh code: $ echo ${.sh.version} Version M 1993-12-28 i $ for i in ; do echo $i; done $ -- |Chris Costello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Breakthrough: It nearly booted on the first try. `------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: empty lists in for Martin Cracauer
- Re: empty lists in for (/bin/sh) Max Khon
- Re: empty lists in for (/bin/sh... Martin Cracauer
- Re: empty lists in for W Gerald Hicks
- Re: empty lists in for W Gerald Hicks
- Re: empty lists in for Doug Barton
- Re: empty lists in for W Gerald Hicks
- Re: empty lists in for Doug Barton
- Re: empty lists in for John Polstra
- Re: empty lists in for W Gerald Hicks
- Re: empty lists in for Chris Costello
- Re: empty lists in for Max Khon
- Re: empty lists in for Chris Costello
- Re: empty lists in for David Scheidt
- Re: empty lists in for Arindum Mukerji
- Re: empty lists in for Christian Weisgerber
- Re: empty lists in for Sheldon Hearn
- Re: empty lists in for Doug Barton
- Re: empty lists in for Sheldon Hearn
- Re: empty lists in for Warner Losh
- Re: empty lists in for Doug Barton