In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Given that Bash in both standard and POSIX mode complains about 'for i > in ; do echo $i; done', I would say that it's not POSIX compatible. What > could/does depend on this behavior "working?" It works for the realistic cases that might actually be useful. E.g.,: x= for i in $x; do echo $i done works fine. I don't think it matters very much that the pathological case "for i in ; ..." doesn't work. John To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- empty lists in for Max Khon
- Re: empty lists in for Sheldon Hearn
- Re: empty lists in for Doug Barton
- Re: empty lists in for W Gerald Hicks
- Re: empty lists in for Doug Barton
- Re: empty lists in for John Polstra
- Re: empty lists in for Doug Barton
- Re: empty lists in for John Polstra
- Re: empty lists in for Martin Cracauer
- Re: empty lists in for (/bin/sh) Max Khon
- Re: empty lists in for (/bin... Martin Cracauer
- Re: empty lists in for W Gerald Hicks
- Re: empty lists in for W Gerald Hicks
- Re: empty lists in for Doug Barton
- Re: empty lists in for W Gerald Hicks
- Re: empty lists in for Doug Barton