W Gerald Hicks wrote:
> 
> > > bash and ksh complain about unexpected ';'.
> > > /bin/sh (FreeBSD) thinks it's ok and does nothing.
> > > Which behaviour is more POSIXly correct?
> 
> >
> > Neither bash nor ksh claim to be particularly POSIX compliant.  our
> > /bin/sh does.  I seem to remember POSIX being ambiguous on this one, but
> > my books are at the office.  If you haven't gotten a more conclusive
> > answer by Monday, mail me and I'll look it up.
> 
> I much prefer the current behavior and believe there may be many things
> which depend on it.

        Given that Bash in both standard and POSIX mode complains about 'for i
in ; do echo $i; done', I would say that it's not POSIX compatible. What
could/does depend on this behavior "working?"

Doug
-- 
"Welcome to the desert of the real." 

    - Laurence Fishburne as Morpheus, "The Matrix"


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to