:> did not. In general, NFS fixes for the -stable branch have been kept
:> up to date with the work in -current, but -current ought to have much
:> better NFS performance then stable.
:
:Performance = transfer rates and latency? Or just generalized stability?
:I haven't had the time to watch -CURRENT all that closely, but I'll be
:happy when some of the new functionality becomes -STABLE.
:
:Thanks for the reply,
:- Ryan
There were a few bugs that we couldn't fix in stable, mainly related
to localhost NFS mounts and garbage showing up past EOF when mmap()ing
a file over NFS. Normal use of NFS will not hit the bugs. -Current
fixes those bugs plus adds some major performance optimizations.
I'd stick with 3.x for the moment. Move to 4.x after 4.1 is released.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:--
: Ryan Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: Systems Administrator, Accounts
: Phone: +1 (306) 664-1161
:
: SaskNow Technologies http://www.sasknow.com
: #106-380 3120 8th St E Saskatoon, SK S7H 0W2
:
:
:
:To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
:
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
