Geoff Buckingham wrote: > > I was pointing out to Chuck Youse that BSD metadata writes are also > > (mostly) asynchronous now, so if FFS is truly slower than ext2fs, there > > must be some other reason. > > > I heard talk the linux folks where using btrees to better handle large > directories. No, current implementation ext2 (and, i think, pre-ext3 too) don`t use btree for handle large directories. Btree associated with Hash Reiser in LinuxWorld 8-) and resierfs. -- "Let's show this prehistoric bitch how we do things downtown!" -- The Ghostbusters To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Ilia Chipitsine
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Chuck Youse
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Ben Rosengart
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Chuck Robey
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ... Ben Rosengart
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than ... Chuck Robey
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than ... Geoff Buckingham
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower t... Aleksey I Zavilohin
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ... David Scheidt
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than ... Ilia Chipitsine
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower t... Mike Smith
- Re: why FFS is THAT slow... Julian Elischer
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower t... Peter Mutsaers
- Re: why FFS is THAT slow... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Don
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Ronald G. Minnich
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Ilia Chipitsine
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ... Ronald G. Minnich