On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Chuck Robey wrote: > > > > Read the post again -- they were using soft updates. > > Why is that important? Soft updates is still far better than an async > filesystem. Have you lost files in panics? I haven't. > Soft updates should get you most of the speed that async updates do. I have lost cylinder groups in panics on systems with soft-updates. (I was using a very buggy kernel module, so things were *hosed*). The original poster hasn't really provided enough information to know what is going on, and what the performance problem is. David Scheidt To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Ilia Chipitsine
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Chuck Youse
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Ben Rosengart
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Chuck Robey
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ... Ben Rosengart
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than ... Chuck Robey
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than ... Geoff Buckingham
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower t... Aleksey I Zavilohin
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ... David Scheidt
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than ... Ilia Chipitsine
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower t... Mike Smith
- Re: why FFS is THAT slow... Julian Elischer
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower t... Peter Mutsaers
- Re: why FFS is THAT slow... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Don
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Ronald G. Minnich
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Ilia Chipitsine
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ... Ronald G. Minnich
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than ... Matthew Dillon