On Sun, Oct 10, 1999, Laurence Berland wrote: > I like the idea as an optional LINT parameter that is NOT in the generic > kernel. Might make some linux people feel comfortable with the switch, > or might prove useful under some odd circumstances, but I agree it'd be > silly to include it by default (kindof on the level of a splash screen) I disagree. BogoMIPS is a completely meaningless measurement and does not belong in our source tree as it will only produce repository bloat. -- |Chris Costello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |A bug in the code is worth two in the documentation. `---------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU ... Karl Pielorz
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" ... Chris Costello
- Re: CFD: "bogomips&qu... Wilko Bulte
- Re: CFD: "bogomi... Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami
- Re: CFD: "bo... Nick Hibma
- Re: CFD: "bo... Wilko Bulte
- Re: CFD: "bo... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" ... Marc Nicholas
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU ... Kris Kirby
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU perf... Laurence Berland
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU ... Chris Costello
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" ... Brian F. Feldman
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" ... Mike Nowlin
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU performan... Wilko Bulte
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU performan... Chris Costello
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU performan... Ollivier Robert
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU perf... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU perf... Kris Kirby
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU performan... Oliver Fromme
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU perf... Milan Kopacka
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU perf... Peter Wemm