On Thu, Sep 02, 1999, Karl Pielorz wrote: > Chris Costello wrote: > > No, since it would just be useless bloat in the source tree. > > If we must have it, how about a port? - I'm definitely for the "this isn't a > good idea" crowd, When I was using Linux, I thought it was 'cute'... I've > grown up a bit since then... I don't think the local Ports Wraith would be amazingly happy with a port which modifies identcpu.c, which is part of the kernel. > -Kp -- |Chris Costello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Base 8 is just like base 10, if you are missing two fingers. - Tom Lehrer `-------------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU performan... Keith Stevenson
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU perf... David Greenman
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU performan... Julian Elischer
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU perf... Nate Williams
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU ... Julian Elischer
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU perf... Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU ... Wes Peters
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU performan... Robert Sexton
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU perf... Chris Costello
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU ... Karl Pielorz
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" ... Chris Costello
- Re: CFD: "bogomips&qu... Wilko Bulte
- Re: CFD: "bogomi... Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami
- Re: CFD: "bo... Nick Hibma
- Re: CFD: "bo... Wilko Bulte
- Re: CFD: "bo... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" ... Marc Nicholas
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU ... Kris Kirby
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU perf... Laurence Berland
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU ... Chris Costello
- Re: CFD: "bogomips" ... Brian F. Feldman