On Mon, 2 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote:

> I don't think we should change getportbyname.  If the getportbyname
> fails, see if a strtol returns a number, and if so use that.  I don't
> see what is so hard about doing that.

I agree. The change should be made in inetd, not in getportbyname()

> If someone wants to run a service on a port that it wasn't desinged
> for, they can still do it today.  I don't see what the argument
> against this change could possibly be.  There is no evil here.

Changing getportbyname() would be, which is what was discussed before.

-- 
- bill fumerola - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - BF1560 - computer horizons corp -
- ph:(800) 252-2421 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]  -



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to