Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:

>
>     This seems like an unnecessary complication to me.  It would be
>     easier to simply make it a device that you can open(), read(), and
>     write() as I first suggested.
>
>     MFS is not a good template for any of this.  MFS is very, very simple
>     and the pieces that would make a user-level device driver work are
>     considerably more complex because they require the ability to make
>     information available to a user process that is usually available only
>     to the kernel.  MFS makes no progress to this end, because MFS runs
>     (more or less permanently) in supervisor mode.
>
>                                       -Matt

        I'll defer to you on this as I never got far enough into this
project to have discovered all the complications.

                        --John


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to